Photo source:

*Recommended Reading: The Off Task Learner

For anyone providing ABA instruction to a child (teacher, parent, therapist) knowing how to get, and then keep, learner attention will be critical. Just because you start a session with a compliant and attentive child does not mean the session will end that way.  Much of ABA instruction can involve quickly delivering specific demands, and if the child is not properly attending then it can be difficult to truly assess learning.

Even outside of an ABA therapy session, getting and keeping the attention of a child with Autism can be challenging. I find that when I observe non-ABA professionals interacting with kiddos with Autism, they end up “throwing away” lots of demands. They may give a demand to a child who is engrossed in a DVD, has his back turned, or is engaging in vocal stereotypy. When this happens, I really can’t blame the child for not complying with the demand. How can the child comply with a demand to “Come eat dinner” when all he heard was “-inner”?

What most adults determine to be indicators of paying attention (sustained eye contact, immediate responding) can actually be pretty difficult behaviors for a child with Autism. Self-stimulatory behaviors can make paying attention difficult, as can auditory processing issues. For example, if I am at a kids play center with a client and I am trying to give him a demand, I may have to compete with the sounds of kids laughing and screaming, the whoosh of the air conditioner, and the dings coming from a nearby video game. My client might have difficulty tuning all of that out to focus on what I am saying.  

Socialization deficits can also make paying attention difficult for a child with Autism. Looking directly into my eyes may be very aversive to the child, so if forced to “Look at me” they may now be so uncomfortable they can’t really focus on what I’m saying. Or standing in close proximity to me could be a very uncomfortable situation, which makes attending to what I am saying more difficult. All of these factors must be considered when trying to get and keep the attention of a child with Autism.

 I think this is common knowledge, but if not let me share: Just because an individual with Autism is not looking into your eyes, does not mean they’re not listening. I know especially it can come off like disrespect if a child stares at the floor while you are talking to them, but for a child with Autism they may look away in order to put all their focus into listening.

Here are some suggestions for gaining attention:

  • Using the child’s name – I mention this briefly in my Stimming  post, but you really want to avoid using a child’s name to get their attention in an ABA session. You could end up saying the child’s name literally hundreds of times in a 2 hour session, and you are also teaching the child to pair their name with a demand. I will give a very clear example of how unpleasant this is from the child’s point of view. Lets say that every time you are at work, your boss calls out your name (“Tameika!”) and then follows it by giving you more work to do. How long would it take you to start feeling dread and annoyance when your boss says your name? Not very long. So it’s really important not to pair the child’s name with work (“Aidan, touch cup”…..”Aidan, give me yellow”…..”Aidan, how old are you”).
  • Touching/moving the child’s face – Beyond not being a true indicator of attention (the child may orient their face to you, but not their eyes), this can also be pretty aversive. Would you want me to yank your chin towards me because you aren’t paying attention to my story about my vacation? I doubt it. The child may have temporarily forgotten about your presence, so to abruptly touch their face or chin can be very jarring.
  • “Look at me!” –  Understand that saying “look at me” is not the same as asking the child to pay attention. Also, ple-e-ease do not shout at the child "Look at me!". That is not the way you want to gain attention. Use a natural tone of voice and an interesting facial expression, and say something like "Are you looking?" or (while gesturing to materials) "Look here".


  • Use Behavioral Momentum – Behavioral Momentum basically means to allow the individual to contact success first before presenting a demand or task. So if you are conducting an ABA session and the child is not paying attention, give them a few mastered tasks such as “Clap hands……stand up”. Then put out your cards/materials and start teaching. Be sure to reinforce the mastered tasks. This way the child has a behavioral cycle of {easy(reinforcer)+easy(reinforcer)} before you move to harder tasks, which can make it more likely they will attend.
  • Be fun and engaging – The best ways to gain attention will always be child specific. However I can say that for past clients, we would have goofy things we did at the start of a session such as countdowns, arm/hand squeezes, racing to the work table, etc. For older or more high functioning children, you can offer choices (“Should we do Matching or play the Numbers Game first?”). This way the child is involved in the structure of the session, and you now have their attention.
  • Capture or Contrive M.O. – Capturing the motivation of the child will always lead you into gaining their attention. If I want $5, and you walk up to me holding $5, I’m probably going to pay attention to what you’re saying to me. Wouldn’t you? So start the session by conducting a Reinforcer Preference Assessment, to see what will motivate the individual/client. Gaining and keeping attention should always be a byproduct of consistent Differential Reinforcement, capturing motivation, and approaching the individual with powerful reinforcers.

*Quick Tip:

Attending should not be a skill that is assumed upon. Maybe the individual/client does not know how to attend. In that case, you can use ABA strategies to teach the skill. Here are a few suggested skill acquisition programs to target attending:

Receptive Language
Responding to Name
Attend to an Object  

“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.” 

Maya Angelou, Poet and Author


I love this quote from the wonderful Ms Angelou because it so relates to what I do for families and children as an ABA provider. 

To other ABA professionals I would say: Leave an impression with how you treat people, because whether good or bad that is what will be remembered. Don't focus so much on the technical aspects of the job that you leave your "bedside manner" at home.


Resource: Carr, E., & Durand, M. (1985). Reducing Behavior Problems through Functional Communication Training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111-126

Functional Communication Training is one of those ABA teaching methodologies that everyone should know about, whether you are a parent or professional. Parents and teachers sometimes naturally implement FCT without realizing they are using an ABA strategy. I find that to be true with many things teachers or parents of children with Autism do.

FCT is used to teach and establish replacement behaviors for inappropriate or harmful behaviors such as aggression, escape/elopement, non-compliance, etc. When a child is regularly engaging in disruptive, challenging behaviors that is ALWAYS a form of communication. Even for a verbal child, but particularly for a non verbal child, behavior is a way of communicating wants and needs. My non verbal kiddos are usually the most aggressive kiddos, because they have learned that hits, kicks, and pinches get people moving. They get people doing what you want them to do.

The way FCT works, is it is a strategy used within a comprehensive ABA program. The target behavior is selected and defined, and then through careful observation and data collection a communication deficit is discovered. Then a hypothesis is created in order to select more socially acceptable and appropriate ways for the child to communicate that will also contact naturally occurring reinforcement.

I know that just sounded super technical, so here is a real life example to help explain this a bit.

I had a client a few years ago, lets call her Tiffany. Tiffany was 2 years old, nonverbal, and had some aggressive behaviors. Tiffany communicated mainly through tantrums, leading, or hitting. If Tiffany wanted to eat, she would scream and hit the refrigerator with her fists. If she was tired, she would bang her head on the floor.  Get the picture? After conducting a FBA, and observing the dynamic between Tiffany and her family, I determined that the function of her behaviors was primarily Positive Reinforcement (access to something she wanted).  What I also made very clear to the family was that without a reliable system to communicate her wants and needs, Tiffany had created her own system. The family and I may think the system isn’t acceptable, or label it “maladaptive” but it’s really not. Tiffany’s system was quick, relatively low effort, and it got the job done. People would come running from all over the house once Tiffany started head banging, and when she pummeled the refrigerator a snack would magically appear in about 10 seconds. So how did we teach Tiffany to stop engaging in these challenging and harmful behaviors? With FCT. We taught Tiffany to communicate her wants and needs and then --and here’s the critical part-- we made sure that language contacted reinforcement and behaviors did not. So Tiffany learned that if she slammed her head into Mom’s stomach, Mom would just block the behavior and ignore her. However if Tiffany signed to be picked up, Mom would immediately pick her up and lavish her with attention. That’s FCT in a nutshell: replacing problem behaviors with communication.

When implementing FCT it is important to decide on a communication system that works for the child, and that caregivers will accept. This could include vocal language, PECS, sign language, or a speech generating device. It just depends on the child. Once a communication method has been determined, it is very important to no longer reinforce the problem behaviors. To do so would only undermine the effectiveness of FCT.

Reinforcement and Prompting will be key in teaching the new behavior, as well as keeping the child successful.
The problem behavior must be put on Extinction  so that the child learns that only communication gets needs and wants met. Depending on the child, this can be done with Antecedent interventions or Consequent interventions. Antecedent just means before, so this would focus on preventing the behavior from even occurring. Consequence just means after, so this focuses more on what to do when the behavior occurs.  No one wants to engage in a behavior that doesn’t contact reinforcement-- thats  Operant Conditioning 101.

The last thing I want to emphasize about FCT is it’s important to select reinforcement that is most likely to occur across environments, and in various social settings. In the Carr & Durand article, the researchers taught the children to say the phrase “I don’t understand” to replace problem behaviors during difficult tasks, such as academic work. I love that! Multiple people, whether they are familiar with the child or not, would know how to respond to this phrase. 
What I see happen much more commonly, is the therapist will teach the child to say “Help me”. Here’s my problem with “help me”: the child doesn’t normally receive help, instead the adult does the task for them. I see this all the time, and I have been guilty of this as well. A child who only has a few words walks up to you with their pants half zipped and says “Help me”. Usually, you are so excited that they are talking that you happily reinforce the language and then zip up their pants all the way. The problem with this is that over time, the child is learning that “If I say "help me", then somebody will do this for me”. Whoa, see what happened there? That is not what you want to teach. We want to teach the child to request assistance, not to get out of the task.

I am not saying to stop teaching your child to say “help me”. Just be sure to provide partial help, and not allow the child to escape the task completely.

**More Reading on FCT:

Fisher, W.W., Thompson, R.H., Bowman, L.G., Hagopian, L.P., & Krug, A. (1999).  Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Modification.

Shirley, M. J., Iwata, B. A., Kahng, S., Mazaleski, J. L., & Lerman, D. C. (1997). Does functional communication training compete with ongoing contingencies of reinforcement? An analysis during response acquisition and maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 93-104.

Carr, E.G., & Carlson, J.I. (1993).  Reduction of severe behavior problems in the community using a multicomponent treatment approach.   Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 157-172.

Copyright T. Meadows 2011. All original content on this blog is protected by copyright. Powered by Blogger.
Back to Top